PhilSci Archive

Scientific Understanding, Fictional Understanding, and Scientific Progress

Park, Seungbae (2019) Scientific Understanding, Fictional Understanding, and Scientific Progress. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
ScientificFictional.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (287kB) | Preview


The epistemic account and the noetic account hold that the essence of scientific progress is the increase in knowledge and understanding, respectively. Dellsén (2018) criticizes the epistemic account (Park, 2017a) and defends the noetic account (Dellsén, 2016). I argue that Dellsén’s criticisms against the epistemic account fail, and that his notion of understanding, which he claims requires neither belief nor justification, cannot explain scientific progress, although it can explain fictional progress in science-fiction.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Park, Seungbae
Keywords: Cognitive Episode, Means-End Thesis, Non-Cognitive Episode, Restriction Thesis
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Depositing User: Dr. Seungbae Park
Date Deposited: 25 Aug 2019 01:55
Last Modified: 25 Aug 2019 01:55
Item ID: 16365
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Date: 2019

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item