Azhar, Feraz and Loeb, Abraham (2019) Finely tuned models sacrifice explanatory depth. [Preprint]

Preview

Text azhar+loeb_19.pdf Download (443kB) | Preview

Abstract

It is commonly argued that an undesirable feature of a theoretical or phenomenological model is that salient observables are sensitive to values of parameters in the model. But in what sense is it undesirable to have such 'fine-tuning' of observables (and hence of the underlying model)? In this paper, we argue that the fine-tuning can be interpreted as a shortcoming of the explanatory capacity of the model: in particular it signals a lack of explanatory depth. In support of this argument, we develop a scheme---for models that arise broadly in the sciences---that quantitatively relates fine-tuning of observables described by these models to a lack of depth of explanations based on these models. A significant aspect of our scheme is that, broadly speaking, the inclusion of larger numbers of parameters in a model will decrease the depth of the corresponding explanation. To illustrate our scheme, we apply it in two different settings in which, within each setting, we compare the depth of two competing explanations. The first setting involves explanations for the Euclidean nature of spatial slices of the universe today: in particular, we compare an explanation provided by the big-bang model of the early 1970s (namely, a cosmological model that traces the evolution of the universe back to a singularity without encountering an inflationary period) with an explanation provided by a general model of cosmic inflation. The second setting has a more phenomenological character, where the goal is to infer from a limited sequence of data points, using maximum entropy techniques, the underlying probability distribution from which these data are drawn. In both of these settings we find that our analysis favors the model that intuitively provides the deeper explanation of the observable(s) of interest. We thus provide an account that unifies two 'theoretical virtues' of models used broadly in the sciences---namely, a lack of fine-tuning and explanatory depth---to show that, indeed, finely tuned models sacrifice explanatory depth.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Azhar, Feraz fazhar@nd.edu Loeb, Abraham aloeb@cfa.harvard.edu
Keywords:	Fine-tuning, explanation, explanatory depth, cosmic inflation, maximum entropy modeling
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Physics > Cosmology General Issues > Explanation Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics General Issues > Values In Science
Depositing User:	Dr. Feraz Azhar
Date Deposited:	31 Oct 2019 06:01
Last Modified:	31 Oct 2019 06:01
Item ID:	16598
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Physics > Cosmology General Issues > Explanation Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics General Issues > Values In Science
Date:	28 October 2019
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16598

Available Versions of this Item

• Finely tuned models sacrifice explanatory depth. (deposited 31 Oct 2019 06:01) [Currently Displayed]
  • Finely tuned models sacrifice explanatory depth. (deposited 18 Dec 2020 05:03)

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item