PhilSci Archive

Reconsidering the inverse gambler's fallacy charge against the fine-tuning argument for the multiverse

Friederich, Simon (2018) Reconsidering the inverse gambler's fallacy charge against the fine-tuning argument for the multiverse. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 50. pp. 29-41. ISSN 0925-4560

[img]
Preview
Text
Friederich2019_Article_ReconsideringTheInverseGambler.pdf - Published Version

Download (423kB) | Preview

Abstract

Does the claimed fine-tuning of the constants of nature for life give reason to think that there are many other universes in which the constants have different values (a “multiverse”)? Or does the inference from fine-tuning to a multiverse commit what Hacking calls the inverse gambler’s fallacy? The present paper considers two fine-tuning problems that seem promising to consider because they are in many respects analogous to the problem of the fine-tuned constants. Reasoning that parallels the inference from fine-tuning to a multiverse seems prima facie adequate in these problems. However, it turns out that in both cases there are independent empirical reasons to believe the hypotheses that are analogous to the multiverse hypothesis. In the absence of such evidence, it would be coherent to raise the inverse gambler’s fallacy charge against the inference from fine-tuning to these multiverse-type hypotheses. In response to this finding, I suggest taking the possibility seriously that established standards of rationality may not allow us to decide whether the inference from fine-tuning to a multiverse is fallacious or not. The paper concludes by sceptically assessing the prospects for obtaining independent empirical evidence for concrete multiverse theories.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Friederich, Simonemail@simonfriederich.eu0000-0003-4372-5995
Keywords: fine-tuning, anthropic reasoning, inverse gambler's fallacy, multiverse
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Cosmology
General Issues > Evidence
Depositing User: Dr. Simon Friederich
Date Deposited: 05 Jan 2020 10:51
Last Modified: 05 Jan 2020 10:51
Item ID: 16785
Journal or Publication Title: Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Publisher: Springer
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1007/s10838-018-9422-3
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Cosmology
General Issues > Evidence
Date: 18 June 2018
Page Range: pp. 29-41
Volume: 50
ISSN: 0925-4560
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16785

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item