PhilSci Archive

A modest defense of geoengineering research

Winsberg, Eric (2019) A modest defense of geoengineering research. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
Text
modest defense 1.28.20.pdf

Download (160kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper examines the ethics of geoengineering research--particular research regarding solar radiation management using stratospheric aerosols. It takes a broadly consequentialist approach. The goal is to estimate the expected utility of conducting the research itself. The approach is to make no appeals to fundamental research freedoms; nor to simply assume from the fact that the expected utility of pursuing geoengineering implementations presently looks negative, that the research itself has negative expected utility. The paper asks, instead: Assuming that the balance of risks at the present moment looks stacked against the wisdom of pursuing a particular implementation, are there in fact good reasons for opposing mere research into geoengineering strategies? It concludes that a modest defense of this research is warranted.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Winsberg, Ericwinsberg@usf.edu
Keywords: Climate, geoengineering, freedom of research
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Climate Science and Meteorology
Depositing User: Eric Winsberg
Date Deposited: 30 Jan 2020 00:03
Last Modified: 30 Jan 2020 00:03
Item ID: 16864
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Climate Science and Meteorology
Date: 2 October 2019
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16864

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item