PhilSci Archive

What Can Philosophers Really Learn from Science Journals?

Lean, Oliver M and Rivelli, Luca and Pence, Charles H. (2020) What Can Philosophers Really Learn from Science Journals? [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
Text
LRP_Preprint.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (164kB) | Preview

Abstract

Philosophers of science regularly use scientific publications in their research. To make their analyses of the literature more thorough, some have begun to use computational methods from the digital humanities (DH). Yet this creates a tension: it’s become a truism in science studies that the contents of scientific publications do not accurately reflect the complex realities of scientific investigation. In this paper, we outline existing views on how scientific publications fit into the broader picture of science as a system of practices, and find that none of these views exclude articles as valuable sources for philosophical inquiry. Far from ignoring the gap between texts and practice, proper use of DH tools requires, and can even contribute to, our understanding of that gap and its implications.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Lean, Oliver Momlean@gmail.com
Rivelli, Lucaluca.rivelli@gmail.com
Pence, Charles H.charles@charlespence.net0000-0002-6836-6047
Keywords: empirical philosophy; digital humanities; big data; scientific literature; scientific practice; publication
Subjects: General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
Depositing User: Charles H. Pence
Date Deposited: 09 Jul 2020 02:42
Last Modified: 09 Jul 2020 02:42
Item ID: 17448
Subjects: General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
Date: 11 May 2020
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/17448

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item