Jebeile, Julie and Barberousse, Anouk
(2021)
Model spread and progress in climate modelling.
[Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/19244/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/2021_Jebeile-Barberousse_%28EJPS%29_Model%20spread%20and%20progress%20in%20climate%20modelling.pdf)  Preview |
|
Text
2021_Jebeile-Barberousse_(EJPS)_Model spread and progress in climate modelling.pdf
Download (2MB)
| Preview
|
Abstract
Convergence of model projections is often considered by climate scientists to be an important objective in so far as it may indicate the robustness of the models’ core hypotheses. Consequently, the range of climate projections from a multi-model ensemble, called “model spread”, is often expected to reduce as climate research moves forward. However, the successive Assessment Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change indicate no reduction in model spread, whereas it is indisputable that climate science has made improvements in its modelling. In this paper, after providing a detailed explanation of the situation, we describe an epistemological setting in which a steady (and even slightly increased) model spread is not doomed to be seen as negative, and is indeed compatible with a desirable evolution of climate models taken individually. We further argue that, from the perspective of collective progress, as far as the improvement of the products of a multi-model ensemble (e.g. means) is concerned, reduction of model spread is of lower priority than model independence.
Available Versions of this Item
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}