PhilSci Archive

Dimensions of Explanation

Hochstein, Eric (2023) Dimensions of Explanation. [Preprint]

[img] Text
Dimensions_of_Explanation11 RR10 TOUCH UPS.docx

Download (80kB)


Some argue that the term “explanation” in science is ambiguous, referring to at least three distinct concepts: a communicative concept, a representational concept, and an ontic concept. Each is defined in a different way with its own sets of norms and goals, and each of which can apply in contexts where the others do not. In this paper, I argue that such a view is false. Instead, I propose that a scientific explanation is a complex entity that can always be analyzed along a communicative dimension, a representational dimension, and an ontic dimension. But all three are always present within scientific explanations. I highlight what such an account looks like, and the potential problems it faces (namely that a single explanation can appear to have incompatible sets of norms and goals that govern it). I propose a solution to this problem and demonstrate how this account can help to dissolve current disputes in philosophy of science regarding debates between epistemic and ontic accounts of mechanistic explanations in the life sciences.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Keywords: Evaluative Dimension; Communicative Concept of Explanation; Representational Concept of Explanation; Ontic Concept of Explanation; Mechanistic Explanation.
Subjects: General Issues > Explanation
General Issues > Philosophers of Science
Depositing User: Dr. Eric Hochstein
Date Deposited: 20 Sep 2023 11:35
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2023 11:35
Item ID: 22560
Subjects: General Issues > Explanation
General Issues > Philosophers of Science
Date: 19 September 2023

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item