PhilSci Archive

Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate

Guala, Francesco (2010) Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. [Preprint]

[img] PDF
DEAS-2010_23wp.pdf

Download (237kB)

Abstract

Strong Reciprocity theorists claim that cooperation in social dilemma games can be sustained by costly punishment mechanisms that eliminate incentives to free ride, even in one-shot and finitely repeated games. There is little doubt that costly punishment raises cooperation in laboratory conditions. Its efficacy in the field however is controversial. I distinguish two interpretations of experimental results, and show that the wide interpretation endorsed by Strong Reciprocity theorists is unsupported by ethnographic evidence on decentralised punishment and by historical evidence on common pool institutions. The institutions that spontaneously evolve to solve dilemmas of cooperation typically exploit low-cost mechanisms, turning finite games into indefinitely repeated ones and eliminating the cost of sanctioning.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Guala, Francesco
Keywords: Experiments, Cooperation, Punishment, Evolution
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Economics
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Sociology
Depositing User: Francesco Guala
Date Deposited: 22 Jul 2010
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:13
Item ID: 2365
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2365

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item