Maxwell, Nicholas (2000) SIMPLICITY. [Preprint]
| Plain Text Download (79Kb) |
Abstract
There are two problems of simplicity. What does it mean to characterize a scientific theory as simple, unified or explanatory in view of the fact that a simple theory can always be made complex (and vice versa) by a change of terminology? How is preference in science for simple theories to be justified? In this paper I put forward a proposal as to how the first problem is to be solved. The more nearly the totality of fundamental physical theory exemplifies the metaphysical thesis that the universe has a unified dynamic structure, so the simpler that totality of theory is. What matters is content, not form. This proposed solution may appear to be circular, but I argue that it is not. Towards the end of the paper I make a few remarks about the second, justificational problem of simplicity.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | simplicity unity beauty metaphysics symmetry explanation empiricism theory-of-everything gauge invariance induction physicalism |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Explanation Specific Sciences > Physics General Issues > Structure of Theories General Issues > Theory Change |
| Depositing User: | Nicholas Maxwell |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Apr 2001 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:10 |
| Item ID: | 252 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/252 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


