Imbert, Cyrille (2005) Why diachronically emergent properties must also be salient. [Preprint]
| PDF Download (604Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, I criticize Bedau's definition of `diachronically emergent properties' (DEPs), which says that a property is a DEP if it can only be predicted by a simulation (simulation requirement) and is nominally emergent. I argue at length that this definition is not complete because it fails to eliminate trivial cases. I discuss the features that an additional criterion should meet in order to complete the definition and I develop a notion, salience, which together with the simulation requirement can be used to characterize DEPs. In the second part of the paper, I sketch this notion. Basically, a property is salient when one can find an indicator, namely a descriptive function (DF), that is such that its fitting description shifts from one elementary mathematical object (EMO) to another when the property appears. Finally, I discuss restrictions that must be brought to what can count as DFs and EMOs if the definition of salience is to work and be non trivial. I conclude that salience (or a refined version of it) can complete the definition of DEPs.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Emergence. Complexity. Salience. Novelty. |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Computer Science General Issues > Reductionism/Holism Specific Sciences > Complex Systems Specific Sciences > Physics |
| Depositing User: | Cyrille Imbert |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Aug 2006 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:14 |
| Item ID: | 2884 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2884 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


