PhilSci Archive

The Use of Examples

Birk, Elisabeth (2007) The Use of Examples. In: [2006] Beyond Mimesis and Nominalism: Representation in Art and Science (London, 22-23 June 2006).

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (41Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    One of the most important problems for a study of symbolic practices (pictorial, verbal or other) is the choice of a language of description that is general enough to allow for comparisons between different symbolic practices and specific enough to allow for meaningful descriptions of actual practices. I will argue that Goodman’s theory of symbols provides some of the categories needed for such an analysis. I will try to indicate this by looking at Goodman’s analysis of a symbolic practice that – though widely used in many different kinds of discourse – has generally not received much attention: the giving of examples. Goodman’s extensional description of exemplification allows us to differentiate between various types of examples and to determine what we mean when we say that examples ‘show’ something. In this way, conflicting approaches to the question of examples (namely Kant and Wittgenstein) can be seen as complementary. A theory of symbols can operate these clarifications by virtue of its strict extensionalism.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
    Keywords: Examples, Goodman, Kant
    Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
    Conferences and Volumes: [2006] Beyond Mimesis and Nominalism: Representation in Art and Science (London, 22-23 June 2006)
    Depositing User: Elisabeth Birk
    Date Deposited: 14 Feb 2007
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:14
    Item ID: 3175
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3175

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads