PhilSci Archive

How do Structural Formulas Embody the Theory of Organic Chemistry?

Goodwin, William (2008) How do Structural Formulas Embody the Theory of Organic Chemistry? [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
GOEmbody.doc

Download (76kB)
[img]
Preview
PDF
GoodwinFigure1.pdf

Download (23kB)
[img]
Preview
PDF
GoodwinFigure2.pdf

Download (19kB)

Abstract

Organic chemistry provides fertile ground for scholars interested in understanding the role of non-linguistic representations in scientific thinking. In this discipline, it is plausible to think of textual representation as supplementing theories whose principle expression is diagrammatic. Among the many sorts of diagrams employed by organic chemists, structural formulas are the most important. In this paper, by examining two central episodes in the development of structural formulas -- Kekulé’s proposal of a structure for benzene and Ingold’s explanation of dipole moments in terms of ‘mesomerism’ – I investigate how the norms for the production and interpretation of structural formulas evolve in response to experimental results. I conclude that one principle way in which structural formulas embody the theory of organic chemistry is through these evolving norms.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Goodwin, William
Additional Information: to be presented at PSA 2008
Keywords: organic chemistry, visual representation, scientific theories
Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
Specific Sciences > Chemistry
Depositing User: William Mark Goodwin
Date Deposited: 25 Sep 2008
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:17
Item ID: 4202
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4202

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item