Catren, Gabriel (2008) Can Classical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
| PDF Download (165Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
We propose a definition of physical objects that aims to clarify some interpretational problems in quantum mechanics. We claim that the transformations induced by an objective property of a physical system must leave invariant all the other objective properties of the same system. The uncertainty principle is understood as a natural consequence of the imbrication between objective properties and non-objective properties. It follows from the proposed definition that in classical mechanics non-objective properties are wrongly considered objective. We conclude that, unlike classical mechanics, quantum mechanics provides a complete objective description of physical systems.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | To be published in Constituting Objectivity: Transcendental Approaches of Modern Physics, M. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg, and J. Petitot (eds.), The Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 74., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, February 2009. |
| Keywords: | Quantum mechanics |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Gabriel Catren |
| Date Deposited: | 04 Nov 2008 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:17 |
| Item ID: | 4295 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4295 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Can Classical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (deposited 15 Oct 2007)
- Can Classical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? (deposited 04 Nov 2008)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


