PhilSci Archive

Securing Scientific Evidence

Staley, Kent (2008) Securing Scientific Evidence. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (194Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    Evidence claims depend on fallible assumptions. Three strategies for making true evidence claims in spite of this fallibility are strengthening the support for those assumptions, weakening conclusions, and using multiple independent tests to produce robust evidence. Reliability itself, understood in frequentist terms, does not explain the usefulness of all three strategies; robustness, in particular, sometimes functions in a way that is not well-characterized in terms of reliability. I argue that, in addition to reliability, the security of evidence claims is of epistemic value, where an evidence claim is secure relative to an epistemic situation if it remains true in all scenarios that are epistemically possible relative to that epistemic situation.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: evidence, robustness, reliability, security
    Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
    Depositing User: Kent Staley
    Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2008
    Last Modified: 27 Sep 2011 08:26
    Item ID: 4367
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4367

    Available Versions of this Item

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads