PhilSci Archive

Underdetermination, methodological practices, and the case of John Snow

Tulodziecki, D. (2009) Underdetermination, methodological practices, and the case of John Snow. In: [2009] Underdetermination in Science (Pittsburgh, 21-22, March 2009).

Download (141Kb) | Preview


    My talk will be guided by the idea that there are some familiar scientific practices that are epistemically significant. I will argue that we can test for the success of these practices empirically by examining cases in the history of science. Specifically, I will reconstruct one particular episode in the history of medicine – John Snow's reasoning concerning the infectiousness of cholera – and offer this case as a concrete example of the sort of empirical research that needs to be done in order to discover what kinds of methodological practices and rules are actually of epistemic interest. Analysing this case, I will explain how it (and other cases like it) can help us resolve specific cases of underdetermination. After exploring some possible anti-realist responses to this argument, I will conclude that, while the anti-realist is (more or less legitimately) able to construct underdetermination scenarios on a case-by-case basis, he will likely have to abandon the strategy of using algorithms to do so, thus losing the much needed guarantee that there will always be rival cases of the required kind.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
    Keywords: underdetermination, theoretical virtues
    Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
    Conferences and Volumes: [2009] Underdetermination in Science (Pittsburgh, 21-22, March 2009)
    Depositing User: Dana Tulodziecki
    Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2009
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:17
    Item ID: 4518

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads