Oliveira, J.C.P. (2002) Carnap, Revisionism and "Truth and Confirmation". [Preprint]
| Microsoft Word (.doc) Download (72Kb) |
Abstract
In recent years, a revisionist process focused on logical positivism can be observed. One aspect of this revisionism -defended by authors like Michael Friedman, John Earman and George Reisch - is the thesis that Carnap�s later thought is compatible with that of Kuhn and even that Carnap anticipates some relevant points of Kuhn�s theory of science. In this paper I discuss one of Carnap�s texts most frequently cited by revisionists in favor of their thesis -"Truth and Confirmation" - trying to put it in the context of Carnap�s work. My intention is to analyze revisionist interpretation on the basis of other texts by Carnap and show that revisionists, while assembling their jigsaw puzzle concerning Carnap�s work, have inadvertently forgotten to consider some pieces of importance in the formation of a theoretically and historically cogent picture.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | History of Philosophy of Science, Carnap, Kuhn, Revisionism, Logical Positivism, Logical Empiricism |
| Subjects: | General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism General Issues > Philosophers of Science |
| Depositing User: | J. C. Pinto de Oliveira |
| Date Deposited: | 17 May 2002 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:10 |
| Item ID: | 645 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/645 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


