Gokhale, Raam (2010) Resolution of Grue Using a Support Measure. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
|Microsoft Word (A Resolution of Goodman's New Riddle of Induction) - Updated Version |
Abstract Goodman’s grue paradox is unassailable if we hold that instances confirm generalizations, for the evidence at hand is both an instance of ‘All emeralds are green’ and ‘All emeralds are grue’. But if we consider what bearing the denials of the two hypotheses have on the evidence, a very different picture emerges. This paper argues that the denial of ‘All emeralds are grue’ is more positively relevant to the evidence to date than the denial of ‘All emeralds are green’ is to the evidence and that therefore ‘All emeralds are green’ is better supported by the evidence than ‘All emeralds are grue’. The measure of support we employ—S(h|e) = p(e|h) – p(e|~h)—is motivated by the familiar relevance condition of confirmation, namely e confirms h only if p(h|e) > p(h).
|Export/Citation:||EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL|
|Social Networking:|| |
|Subjects:||General Issues > Confirmation/Induction|
|Depositing User:||Mr. Raam Gokhale|
|Date Deposited:||05 Nov 2010 08:29|
|Last Modified:||06 Nov 2010 09:07|
Available Versions of this Item
- Resolution of Grue Using a Support Measure. (deposited 18 Oct 2010 07:40)
- Resolution of Grue Using a Support Measure. (deposited 05 Nov 2010 08:29)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)