Lutz, Sebastian (2011) Empiricism and Intelligent Design I: Three Empiricist Challenges. [Preprint]

Preview

PDF lutz-empiricism_and_id_1.pdf Download (208kB)

Abstract

Due to the logical relations between theism and intelligent design (ID), there are two challenges to theism that also apply to ID. In the falsifiability challenge, it is charged that theism is compatible with every observation statement and thus asserts nothing. I argue that the contentious assumptions of this challenge can be avoided without loss of precision by charging theism (and thus ID) directly with the lack of observational assertions. In the translatability challenge, it is charged that theism can be translated into a (non-theistic) set of observation statements without loss of cognitive content. I argue that the contentious assumptions of this challenge are avoided by the related charge that the (non-theistic) evolutionary theory makes all the observational assertions of ID, while the converse does not hold. Elliott Sober has argued that ID meets the falsifiability challenge, but, since it makes almost no observational assertions, is not testable. I point out two problems with Sober’s argument and show that ID is both deductively and probabilistically testable. Sober’s argument, I suggest, inconsistently combines the modified falsifiability challenge with the modified translatability challenge. If his claims about ID’s observational assertions are true, however, ID succumbs to the modified translatability challenge.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Lutz, Sebastian sebastian.lutz@gmx.net
Additional Information:	Companion piece to "Empiricism and Intelligent Design II: Analyzing Intelligent Design" (http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8612)
Keywords:	empiricism; empirical significance; falsifiability; empirical content; testability; intelligent design; theism
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience General Issues > Theory/Observation
Depositing User:	Sebastian Lutz
Date Deposited:	13 May 2011 11:41
Last Modified:	13 May 2011 11:41
Item ID:	8611
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience General Issues > Theory/Observation
Date:	12 May 2011
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8611

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item