Zilhão, António (2012) Moore's Problem. In: UNSPECIFIED.
Microsoft Word
2012_MUGLA_-_MOORE’S_PROBLEM.docx - Draft Version Download (126kB) |
Abstract
Moore’s problem or Moore’s ‘paradox’ arises from the fact that consistent propositions of the form of (1) and (2):
(1) It is raining but I believe it is not raining
(2) It is raining but I don’t believe it is raining
strike us as being contradictory. Shoemaker explained this oddity by producing a proof that belief in such sentences is either inconsistent or self-refuting. For Sorensen many propositional attitudes have scopes smaller than the class of consistent propositions. Inaccessible consistent propositions are ‘blindspots’. Moore-propositions are the blindspots of belief. According to either, Moore-propositions are unbelievable. I argue that Moore-propositions are actually believable.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Criteria of Doxastic Admissibility, Desiderata of Belief Formation, Logical Paradoxes, Rationality | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Thought Experiments | ||||||
Depositing User: | António Zilhão | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 15 Jul 2012 00:27 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 23 Jul 2019 12:32 | ||||||
Item ID: | 9229 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Thought Experiments | ||||||
Date: | 14 June 2012 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9229 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |