PhilSci Archive

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument

Lewis, Peter J. (2012) The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img] Microsoft Word

Download (76kB)


The Simulation Argument and the Doomsday Argument share certain structural similarities, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Aranyosi 2004, Richmond 2008, Bostrom and Kulczycki 2011). Both are cases where reflecting on one’s location among a set of possibilities yields a counter-intuitive conclusion—in one case that the end of humankind is closer than you initially thought, and in the second case that it is more likely than you initially thought that you are living in a computer simulation. Indeed, the two arguments do share strong structural similarities. But there are also some disanalogies between the two arguments, and I argue that these disanalogies mean that the Simulation Argument succeeds and the Doomsday Argument fails.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Lewis, Peter
Keywords: Doomsday argument, simulation argument, self-location, centered credence
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Depositing User: Peter J. Lewis
Date Deposited: 27 Oct 2012 17:38
Last Modified: 17 Jan 2013 19:07
Item ID: 9386
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Date: 25 October 2012

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item