Machery, Edouard
(2006)
Massive Modularity and Brain Evolution.
In: UNSPECIFIED.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d1c/e4d1ced2a47dea317e57e10434f6e3f43984f58c" alt="" Preview |
|
PDF
Evolutionary_Psychology_and_Brain_Evolution_PSA_2006_machery.pdf
Download (130kB)
|
Abstract
Quartz (2002) argues that some recent findings about the evolution of the brain (Finlay & Darlington, 1995) are inconsistent with evolutionary psychologists’ massive modularity hypothesis. In substance, Quartz contends that since the volume of the neocortex evolved in a concerted manner, natural selection did not act on neocortical systems independently of each other, which is a necessary condition for the massive modularity of our cognition to be true. I argue however that Quartz’s argument fails to undermine the massive modularity hypothesis.
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f512a/f512a504e06a6d662a332a21d0d1d826e7ccd6c9" alt="View Item View Item" |
View Item |