Weatherall, James Owen (2015) Regarding the "Hole Argument". [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
Hole_Argument_FINAL.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (312kB) |
Abstract
I argue that the Hole Argument is based on a misleading use of the mathematical formalism of general relativity. If one is attentive to mathematical practice, I will argue, the Hole Argument is blocked.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Einstein, hole argument, general relativity, substantivalism, relationism | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory |
||||||
Depositing User: | James Owen Weatherall | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 21 Jul 2015 14:46 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 21 Jul 2015 14:46 | ||||||
Item ID: | 11578 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory |
||||||
Date: | 2015 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11578 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Regarding the "Hole Argument". (deposited 01 Dec 2014 15:55)
- Regarding the "Hole Argument". (deposited 21 Jul 2015 14:46) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |