Bogen, Jim (2015) Empiricism and After. [Preprint]
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_msword.png) |
Microsoft Word
jan_2_empandaft_final.docx - Accepted Version Download (543kB) |
Abstract
Familiar versions of empiricism overemphasize and misconstrue the importance of perceptual experience. I discuss their main shortcomings and sketch an alternative framework for thinking about how human sensory systems contribute to scientific knowledge.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | empiricism, evidence, credibility, theory testing, data/phenomena | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Theory/Observation | ||||||
| Depositing User: | jim bogen | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 22 Feb 2015 15:25 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 22 Feb 2015 15:25 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 11336 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Theory/Observation | ||||||
| Date: | 20 February 2015 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11336 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}