Brigandt, Ingo (2015) Social Values Influence the Adequacy Conditions of Scientific Theories: Beyond Inductive Risk. In: UNSPECIFIED.
PDF
Social_values_influence_the_adequacy_conditions_of_scientific_theories.pdf Download (134kB) |
Abstract
The ‘death of evidence’ issue in Canada raises the specter of politicized science, and thus the question of what role social values may have in science and how this meshes with objectivity and evidence. I first criticize philosophical accounts that have to separate different steps of research to restrict the influence of social and other non-epistemic values. A prominent account that social values may play a role even in the context of theory acceptance is the argument from inductive risk. It maintains that the more severe the social consequences of erroneously accepting a theory would be, the more evidence is needed before the theory may be accepted. However, an implication of this position is that increasing evidence makes the impact of social values converge to zero; and I argue for a stronger role for social values. On this position, social values (together with epistemic values and other empirical considerations) may determine a theory’s conditions of adequacy, which among other things can include considerations about what makes a scientific account unbiased and complete. I illustrate this based on recent theories of human evolution and the social behaviour of non-human primates, where some of the social values implicated are feminist values. While many philosophical accounts (both arguments from inductive risk and from underdetermination) conceptualize the relevance of social values in terms of making inferences from evidence, I argue for the need for a broader philosophical framework, which is also motivated by issues pertaining to scientific explanation.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Additional Information: | Penultimate draft of a paper forthcoming in the Canadian Journal of Philosophy | ||||||
Keywords: | epistemic values; social values; feminist values; androcentrism; inductive risk; theory acceptance; adequacy conditions; explanation | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology General Issues > Explanation General Issues > Feminist Approaches General Issues > Science and Society General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||
Depositing User: | Ingo Brigandt | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 31 Jul 2015 13:36 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 31 Jul 2015 13:36 | ||||||
Item ID: | 11597 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology General Issues > Explanation General Issues > Feminist Approaches General Issues > Science and Society General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||
Date: | 2015 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11597 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |