Plutynski, A (2008) The Rise and Fall of the Adaptive Landscape? [Preprint]
|
Text
riseandfallrevision.pdf - Submitted Version Download (246kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The discussion of the adaptive landscape in the philosophical literature appears to be divided along the following lines. On the one hand, some claim that the adaptive landscape is either “uninterpretable” or incoherent. On the other hand, some argue that the adaptive landscape has been an important heuristic, or tool in the service of explaining, as well as proposing and testing hypotheses about evolutionary change. This paper attempts to reconcile these two views.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | adaptive landscape, S. Wright, heuristic, modeling, analogy, metaphor | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory General Issues > Models and Idealization |
||||||
Depositing User: | A Plutynski | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2018 00:35 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 13 Nov 2018 00:35 | ||||||
Item ID: | 15306 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory General Issues > Models and Idealization |
||||||
Date: | 2008 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15306 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |