McCutcheon, Randall G. (2018) Random and Systematic Error in the Puzzle of the Unmarked Clock. [Preprint]
|
Text
gigoA3.pdf Download (225kB) | Preview |
Abstract
A puzzle of an unmarked clock, used by Timothy Williamson to question the KK principle, was separately adapted by David Christensen and Adam Elga to critique a principle of Rational Reflection. Both authors, we argue, flout the received relationship between ideal agency and the classical distinction between systematic and random error, namely that ideal agents are subject only to the latter. As a result, these criticisms miss their mark.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | KK principle, random and systematic error, Rational Reflection | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr. Randall G. McCutcheon | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 29 Nov 2018 17:11 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 29 Nov 2018 17:11 | ||||||
Item ID: | 15401 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
Date: | 28 November 2018 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15401 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |