Park, Seungbae (2018) Rejecting Mathematical Realism while Accepting Interactive Realism.
|
Text
interactive.pdf Download (163kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Indispensablists contend that accepting scientific realism while rejecting mathematical realism involves a double standard. I refute this contention by developing an enhanced version of scientific realism, which I call interactive realism. It holds that interactively successful theories are typically approximately true, and that the interactive unobservable entities posited by them are likely to exist. It is immune to the pessimistic induction while mathematical realism is susceptible to it.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Published Article or Volume | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Indispensability Argument, Interactive Realism, Mathematical Realism, Pessimistic Induction, Scientific Realism | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Ontology |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr. Seungbae Park | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 21 Jan 2019 01:09 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 21 Jan 2019 01:09 | ||||||
Item ID: | 15643 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Ontology |
||||||
Date: | 2018 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15643 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |