Johns, Oliver (2019) Validity of the Einstein Hole Argument. [Preprint]

Preview

Text Johns-Validity-arXiv.pdf Download (173kB) | Preview

Abstract

Arguing from his "hole" thought experiment, Einstein became convinced that, in cases in which the energy-momentum-tensor source vanishes in a spacetime hole, a solution to his general relativistic field equation cannot be uniquely determined by that source. After reviewing the definition of active diffeomorphisms, this paper uses them to outline a mathematical proof of Einstein's result. The relativistic field equation is shown to have multiple solutions, just as Einstein thought. But these multiple solutions can be distinguished by the different physical meaning that each metric solution attaches to the local coordinates used to write it. Thus the hole argument, while formally correct, does not prohibit the subsequent rejection of spurious solutions and the selection of a physically unique metric. This conclusion is illustrated using the Schwarzschild metric. It is suggested that the Einstein hole argument therefore cannot be used to argue against substantivalism.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Johns, Oliver ojohns@metacosmos.org 0000-0003-4251-976X
Keywords:	Hole Argument, Einstein, General Relativity, Active Diffeomorphisms, Differential Geometry
Subjects:	General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Depositing User:	Prof. Oliver D. Johns
Date Deposited:	29 Apr 2019 11:19
Last Modified:	29 Apr 2019 11:19
Item ID:	15946
Subjects:	General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Date:	29 April 2019
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15946

Available Versions of this Item

• Validity of the Einstein Hole Argument. (deposited 29 Apr 2019 11:19) [Currently Displayed]

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item