Bourrat, Pierrick (2019) Being Precise about Precision and One-to-one Specificity. [Preprint]
|
Text
Bourrat_2019Spec.pdf Download (169kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Following from my criticisms of Calcott’s analysis on the permissive/instructive
distinction, I rebut his claims that 1) he clarifies my measure one-to-one specificity; 2) for all
intents and purposes of his analysis his notion of precision is different from my measure of one-
to-one specificity; 3) Waddington box is a better and different model than the extension of
Woodward’s radio I propose.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Causal specificity; Information; Variation of information; Permissive; Instructive; Causation | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Developmental Biology General Issues > Causation Specific Sciences > Computation/Information |
||||||
Depositing User: | Mr Pierrick Bourrat | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 31 Oct 2019 05:56 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2019 05:56 | ||||||
Item ID: | 16580 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Developmental Biology General Issues > Causation Specific Sciences > Computation/Information |
||||||
Date: | 2019 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16580 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |