Vellend, Mark (2019) The Behavioral Economics of Biodiversity Conservation Scientists. Philosophical Topics, 47 (1). pp. 219-237. ISSN 2154-154X
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/other.png) |
Other (Figure 1)
image1.emf Download (92kB) |
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Vellend_PhilosophicalTopics2019_preprint.docx Download (104kB) |
Abstract
Values have a profound influence on the behaviour of all people, scientists included. Biodiversity is studied by ecologists, like myself, most of whom align with the “mission-driven” field of conservation biology. The mission involves the protection of biodiversity, and a set of contextual values including the beliefs that biological diversity and ecological complexity are good and have intrinsic value. This raises concerns that the scientific process might be influenced by biases toward outcomes that are aligned with these values. Retrospectively, I have identified such biases in my own work, resulting from an implicit assumption that organisms that are not dependent on natural habitats (e.g., forests) effectively do not count in biodiversity surveys. Finding that anthropogenic forest disturbance reduces the diversity of plant species dependent on shady forests can thus be falsely equated with more general biodiversity loss. Disturbance might actually increase overall plant diversity (i.e., including all of the species found growing in a particular place). In this paper I ask whether ecologists share values that are unrepresentative of broader society, I discuss examples of potential value-driven biases in biodiversity science, and I present some hypotheses from behavioral economics on possible psychological underpinnings of shared values and preferences among ecologists.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Published Article or Volume | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | biodiversity, values, conservation, ecology, bias | ||||||
| Depositing User: | Dr. Mark Vellend | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 01 Dec 2020 06:07 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 01 Dec 2020 06:07 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 18469 | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Philosophical Topics | ||||||
| Publisher: | University of Arkansas Press | ||||||
| Official URL: | http://muse.jhu.edu/article/774181 | ||||||
| DOI or Unique Handle: | muse.jhu.edu/article/774181 | ||||||
| Date: | 30 April 2019 | ||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 219-237 | ||||||
| Volume: | 47 | ||||||
| Number: | 1 | ||||||
| ISSN: | 2154-154X | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/18469 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}