PhilSci Archive

Incentivizing Replication is Insufficient to Safeguard Default Trust

Desmond, Hugh (2020) Incentivizing Replication is Insufficient to Safeguard Default Trust. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
 Text
2021 - Philosophy of Science - Credit-maximization and Trust.pdf
Download (323kB) | Preview

Abstract

Philosophers of science and meta-scientists alike now typically model scientists’ behavior as driven by credit maximization. In this paper I argue that this modeling assumption cannot account for how scientists have a default level of trust in each other’s assertions. The normative implication of this is that science policy should not only focus on incentive reform.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |
Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Desmond, Hughhugh.desmond@uantwerpen.be0000-0002-4822-923X
Keywords: Replication Crisis; Scientific Methodology; Social Structure of Science; Incentives; Trust
Subjects: General Issues > Ethical Issues
General Issues > Science and Policy
General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
General Issues > Values In Science
Depositing User: Prof. Dr. Hugh Desmond
Date Deposited: 02 Feb 2021 02:57
Last Modified: 02 Feb 2021 02:57
Item ID: 18661
Subjects: General Issues > Ethical Issues
General Issues > Science and Policy
General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
General Issues > Values In Science
Date: March 2020
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/18661

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item