PhilSci Archive

Epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research

Au, Yin Chung (2021) Epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img] Text
EJPA Phil Sci version_Y_Au_2021_epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research.docx

Download (313kB)
[img]
Preview
Image
image1.TIF

Download (80kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Image
image3.TIF

Download (64kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Image
image2.TIF

Download (61kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper proposes an extended version of the interventionist account for causal inference in the practical context of biological mechanism research. This paper studies the details of biological mechanism researchers’ practices of assessing the evidential legitimacy of experimental data, arguing why quantity and variety are two important criteria for this assessment. Because of the nature of biological mechanism research, the epistemic values of these two criteria result from the independence both between the causation of data generation and the causation in question and between different interventions, not techniques. The former independence ensures that the interventions in the causation in question are not affected by the causation that is responsible for data generation. The latter independence ensures the reliability of the final mechanisms not only in the empirical but also the formal aspects. This paper first explores how the researchers use quantity to check the effectiveness of interventions, where they at the same time determine the validity of the difference-making revealed by the results of interventions. Then, this paper draws a distinction between experimental interventions and experimental techniques, so that the reliability of mechanisms, as supported by the variety of evidence, can be safely ensured in the probabilistic sense. The latter process is where the researchers establish evidence of the mechanisms connecting the events of interest. By using case studies, this paper proposes to use ‘intervention’ as the fruitful connecting point of literature between evidence and mechanisms.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Au, Yin Chungz10608041@email.ncku.edu.tw0000-0001-7175-8933
Keywords: Biological mechanism; Evidence; practice; causal inference; independence
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology
General Issues > Causation
General Issues > Evidence
Depositing User: Dr Yin Chung Au
Date Deposited: 28 Mar 2021 20:20
Last Modified: 28 Mar 2021 20:20
Item ID: 18866
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology
General Issues > Causation
General Issues > Evidence
Date: 28 March 2021
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/18866

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item