Au, Yin Chung (2021) Epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research. [Preprint]
There is a more recent version of this item available. |
Text
EJPA Phil Sci version_Y_Au_2021_epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research.docx Download (313kB) |
||
|
Image
image1.TIF Download (80kB) | Preview |
|
|
Image
image3.TIF Download (64kB) | Preview |
|
|
Image
image2.TIF Download (61kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper proposes an extended version of the interventionist account for causal inference in the practical context of biological mechanism research. This paper studies the details of biological mechanism researchers’ practices of assessing the evidential legitimacy of experimental data, arguing why quantity and variety are two important criteria for this assessment. Because of the nature of biological mechanism research, the epistemic values of these two criteria result from the independence both between the causation of data generation and the causation in question and between different interventions, not techniques. The former independence ensures that the interventions in the causation in question are not affected by the causation that is responsible for data generation. The latter independence ensures the reliability of the final mechanisms not only in the empirical but also the formal aspects. This paper first explores how the researchers use quantity to check the effectiveness of interventions, where they at the same time determine the validity of the difference-making revealed by the results of interventions. Then, this paper draws a distinction between experimental interventions and experimental techniques, so that the reliability of mechanisms, as supported by the variety of evidence, can be safely ensured in the probabilistic sense. The latter process is where the researchers establish evidence of the mechanisms connecting the events of interest. By using case studies, this paper proposes to use ‘intervention’ as the fruitful connecting point of literature between evidence and mechanisms.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Biological mechanism; Evidence; practice; causal inference; independence | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology General Issues > Causation General Issues > Evidence |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr Yin Chung Au | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 28 Mar 2021 20:20 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 28 Mar 2021 20:20 | ||||||
Item ID: | 18866 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology General Issues > Causation General Issues > Evidence |
||||||
Date: | 28 March 2021 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/18866 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Epistemic values of quantity and variety of evidence in biological mechanism research. (deposited 28 Mar 2021 20:20) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |