Boudry, Maarten (2021) Why We Should Be Suspicious of Conspiracy Theories. A Novel Demarcation Problem. [Preprint]

Text Why We Should Be Suspicious of Conspiracy Theories.docx Download (138kB)

Abstract

What, if anything, is wrong with conspiracy theories (CTs)? A conspiracy refers to a group of people acting in secret to achieve some nefarious goal. Given that the pages of history are full of such plots, however, why are CTs often regarded with suspicion and even disdain? According “particularism”, the currently dominant view among philosophers, each CT should be evaluated on its own merits and the negative reputation of CTs as a class is wholly undeserved. In this paper, I defend a moderate version of “generalism”, the view that there is indeed something prima facie suspicious about CTs, properly defined, and that they suffer from common epistemic defects. To demarcate legitimate theorizing about real-life conspiracies from “mere conspiracy theories” (in the pejorative sense), I draw on a deep asymmetry between causes and effects in the natural world. Because of their extreme resilience to counterevidence, CTs can be seen as the epistemological equivalent of black holes, in which unwary truth-seekers are drawn, never to escape. Finally, by presenting a generic “recipe” for generating novel CTs around any given event, regardless of the circumstances and the available evidence, I rescue the intuitions beneath colloquial phrases like “That’s just a conspiracy theory.”

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Boudry, Maarten maartenboudry@gmail.com
Keywords:	conspiracy theories; epistemology; causal asymmetry; demarcation problem; falsifiability; generalism; particularism
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology General Issues > Causation General Issues > Evidence General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
Depositing User:	Maarten Maarten Boudry
Date Deposited:	12 Aug 2022 14:36
Last Modified:	12 Aug 2022 14:36
Item ID:	19186
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology General Issues > Causation General Issues > Evidence General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
Date:	June 2021
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/19186

Available Versions of this Item

• Like Black Holes in the Sky: The Warped Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories. (deposited 15 Aug 2020 03:25)
  • Why We Should Be Suspicious of Conspiracy Theories. A Novel Demarcation Problem. (deposited 27 Feb 2021 18:40)
    • Why We Should Be Suspicious of Conspiracy Theories. A Novel Demarcation Problem. (deposited 12 Aug 2022 14:36) [Currently Displayed]

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item