Bradley, Clara and Weatherall, James Owen (2021) Mathematical Responses to the Hole Argument: Then and Now. [Preprint]
|
Text
Mathematical_Responses_Hole_Argument_archive.pdf - Submitted Version Download (204kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We argue that several apparently distinct responses to the hole argument, all invoking formal or mathematical considerations, should be viewed as a unified "mathematical response". We then consider and rebut two prominent critiques of the mathematical response before reflecting on what is ultimately at issue in this literature.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
|||||||||
Keywords: | hole argument, general relativity, substantivalism, relationism | |||||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory |
|||||||||
Depositing User: | Clara Bradley | |||||||||
Date Deposited: | 17 Oct 2021 23:31 | |||||||||
Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2021 23:31 | |||||||||
Item ID: | 19703 | |||||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory |
|||||||||
Date: | 2021 | |||||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/19703 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |