Stuart, Michael T.
(2022)
Scientists are Epistemic Consequentialists about Imagination.
[Preprint]
Abstract
Scientists imagine, and their imaginings can be better or worse. But what does it mean for an imagining to be better or worse? There are at least three metaepistemological frameworks that present different answers to this question: epistemological consequentialism, deontic epistemology, and virtue epistemology. This paper presents empirical evidence that scientists adopt each of these different epistemic frameworks with respect to imagination, but argues that the way they do this is best explained if scientists are fundamentally consequentialists about imagination.
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |