Franklin, Alexander (2022) Explaining the Autonomy of the Special Sciences. [Preprint]
|
Text
Autonomy.pdf Download (968kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Fodor (1997) argues that the special sciences are autonomous, but that this autonomy is mysterious and eludes explanation. Reductionist responses to Fodor tend to eliminativism about autonomy. In this paper I set out a framework for explaining autonomy. Rather than eliminating it, this establishes that the special sciences are, in fact, autonomous from more fundamental sciences, but that this is compatible with reductive explanation.
I cash this out with a case study. Nerve signals are autonomous from the individual ionic motions across the neuronal membrane. In order to explain the autonomy of the nerve signal, we ought to identify the structures at the lower level which give rise to the signal's autonomy. In this case we can do just that: the gated ion channels underwrite the autonomy of nerve signals.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Autonomy Special sciences Reduction Explanation Fodor | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Explanation General Issues > Reductionism/Holism |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr Alexander Franklin | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 26 May 2022 02:12 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 26 May 2022 02:12 | ||||||
Item ID: | 20668 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Explanation General Issues > Reductionism/Holism |
||||||
Date: | May 2022 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/20668 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |