Ward, Zina B. (2022) Disagreement and Values in Science. [Preprint]
|
Text
Ward_Values&Disagreement.pdf Download (263kB) | Preview |
Abstract
It's generally taken to be desirable for scientific hypotheses to possess what are often called "epistemic values": theoretical virtues like fruitfulness, explanatory power, simplicity, and scope (Kuhn 1977). Although most scientists endorse at least some of these values, they often interpret or weigh them differently. Does the presence of disagreement about epistemic values imply that science is laden with non-epistemic values? Here I'll try to answer this question after surveying epistemic values and the disagreements surrounding them.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | values in science; epistemic values; gap argument; Kuhn; Laudan | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Science and Society General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||
Depositing User: | Zina B. Ward | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 05 Jun 2022 03:25 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 05 Jun 2022 03:25 | ||||||
Item ID: | 20714 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Science and Society General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||
Date: | 3 June 2022 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/20714 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |