Price, Huw and Wharton, Ken (2022) Why entanglement? [Preprint]
 | There is a more recent version of this item available. |
|
Text
2212.06986v1.pdf Download (228kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We propose a mechanism for quantum entanglement. The key ingredient is the familiar statistical phenomenon of collider bias, or Berkson's bias. In the language of causal models a collider is a variable causally influenced by two or more other variables. Conditioning on a collider typically produces non-causal associations between its contributing causes, even if they are actually independent. It is easy to show that this phenomenon can produce associations analogous to Bell correlations, in suitable post-selected ensembles. It is also straightforward that such collider artefacts may become real connections, resembling causality, if a collider is 'constrained' (e.g., by a future boundary condition). We consider the time-reversed analogues of these points in the context of retrocausal models of QM. Retrocausality yields a collider at the source of an EPR-Bell particle pair, and in this case constraint of the collider is possible by normal methods of experimental preparation. It follows that connections resembling causality may be expected to emerge across such colliders, from one branch of the experiment to the other. Our hypothesis is that this constrained retrocausal collider bias is the origin of entanglement. The piece is written for a general audience, and is based on a suggestion first made in arXiv:2101.05370 [quant-ph].
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
|||||||||
| Keywords: | Entanglement, collider bias, retrocausality, Bell correlations | |||||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Causation Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Prof Huw Price | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 17 Dec 2022 13:24 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 17 Dec 2022 13:24 | |||||||||
| Item ID: | 21565 | |||||||||
| DOI or Unique Handle: | https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.06986 | |||||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Causation Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
|||||||||
| Date: | 14 December 2022 | |||||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/21565 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Why entanglement? (deposited 17 Dec 2022 13:24) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}