Van Strien, Marij (2023) Why Bohm was never a determinist. [Preprint]
There is a more recent version of this item available. |
|
Text
Why Bohm was never a determinist.pdf Download (297kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Bohm’s interpretation of quantum mechanics has generally been understood as an attempt to restore the determinism of classical physics. However, although Bohm’s interpretation of quantum mechanics, as he initially proposed it in 1952, does indeed have the feature of being deterministic, for Bohm this was never the main point. In fact, in other texts which he published shortly before and after, as well as in correspondence from this period, he argued that the assumption that nature is deterministic is unjustified and should be abandoned. His aim was a different one: to develop an account of quantum mechanics that can be understood. Whereas it has been argued before that Bohm’s commitment to determinism can be linked to his interest in Marxism, I argue for the opposite: in Marxist philosophy, especially Friedrich Engels’ dialectical materialism, Bohm found
resources for developing a notion of causality different from determinism. This non-deterministic causality is based on the idea of infinite complexity and an infinite number of levels of nature. From ca. 1954, Bohm’s conception of causality further weakened, as he developed the idea of a dialectical relation between causality and chance. From now on, Bohm argued that causality and chance are equally indispensable in science, and that wherever we find causality, we can assume that there is underlying chance and vice versa.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | David Bohm Determinism Causality Emergence Dialectical materialism Interpretations of quantum mechanics | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Causation General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
||||||
Depositing User: | Marij Van Strien | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 06 Jul 2023 13:24 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 06 Jul 2023 13:24 | ||||||
Item ID: | 22284 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Causation General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
||||||
Date: | 5 July 2023 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/22284 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Why Bohm was never a determinist. (deposited 06 Jul 2023 13:24) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |