Miller, Ryan (2022) Nonrational Belief Paradoxes as Byzantine Failures. Logos & Episteme, 13 (4). pp. 343-358.
This is the latest version of this item.
|
Text
byzantineirrationality-preprint.pdf - Accepted Version Download (209kB) | Preview |
Abstract
David Christensen and others argue that Dutch Strategies are more like peer disagreements than Dutch Books, and should not count against agents’ conformity to ideal rationality. I review these arguments, then show that Dutch Books, Dutch Strategies, and peer disagreements are only possible in the case of what computer scientists call Byzantine Failures—uncorrected Byzantine Faults which update arbitrary values. Yet such Byzantine Failures make agents equally vulnerable to all three kinds of epistemic inconsistencies, so there is no principled basis for claiming that only avoidance of true Dutch Books characterizes ideally rational agents. Agents without Byzantine Failures can be ideally rational in a very strong sense, but are not normative for humans. Bounded rationality in the presence of Byzantine Faults remains an unsolved problem.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Published Article or Volume | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Byzantine Generals, Dutch Strategies, Ideal Rationality, Dutch books, peer disagreements | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Computer Science Specific Sciences > Psychology > Judgment and Decision Making Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
Depositing User: | Ryan Miller | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2023 15:55 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 31 Aug 2023 15:55 | ||||||
Item ID: | 22474 | ||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Logos & Episteme | ||||||
Official URL: | https://www.pdcnet.org/logos-episteme/content/logo... | ||||||
DOI or Unique Handle: | https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme202213430 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Computer Science Specific Sciences > Psychology > Judgment and Decision Making Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
Date: | December 2022 | ||||||
Page Range: | pp. 343-358 | ||||||
Volume: | 13 | ||||||
Number: | 4 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/22474 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Nonrational Belief Paradoxes as Byzantine Failures. (deposited 16 Aug 2019 12:01)
-
Nonrational Belief Paradoxes as Byzantine Failures. (deposited 24 Nov 2022 15:08)
- Nonrational Belief Paradoxes as Byzantine Failures. (deposited 31 Aug 2023 15:55) [Currently Displayed]
-
Nonrational Belief Paradoxes as Byzantine Failures. (deposited 24 Nov 2022 15:08)
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
View Item |