PhilSci Archive

Dejustifying Scientific Progress

Dellsén, Finnur and Norton, James (2024) Dejustifying Scientific Progress. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
Text
Dejustifying Scientific Progress Web.pdf

Download (276kB) | Preview

Abstract

Stegenga (forthcoming) formulates and defends a novel account of scientific progress, according to which science makes progress just in case there is a change in scientific justification. Here we present several problems for Stegenga’s account, concerning respectively (i) obtaining misleading evidence, (ii) losses or destruction of evidence, (iii) oscillations in scientific justification, and (iv) the possibility of scientific regress. We conclude by sketching a substantially different justification-based account of scientific progress that avoids these problems.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Dellsén, Finnurfinnurd@gmail.com0000-0003-4989-4204
Norton, Jamesjames.norton@utas.edu.au
Additional Information: Forthcoming in Philosophy of Science
Keywords: scientific progress; misleading evidence; scientific regress; scientific justification
Subjects: General Issues > Evidence
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Theory Change
Depositing User: Dr. Finnur Dellsén
Date Deposited: 05 Jun 2024 15:01
Last Modified: 05 Jun 2024 15:01
Item ID: 23522
Subjects: General Issues > Evidence
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Theory Change
Date: 2024
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/23522

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item