Butterfield, Jeremy (2004) On the Persistence of Homogeneous Matter. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
|
PDF
DiscsJul051.pdf Download (629kB) |
Abstract
Some recent philosophical debate about persistence has focussed on an argument against perdurantism that discusses rotating perfectly homogeneous discs (the `rotating discs argument'; RDA). The argument has been mostly discussed by metaphysicians, though it appeals to ideas from classical mechanics, especially about rotation. In contrast, I assess the RDA from the perspective of the philosophy of physics. After introducing the argument and emphasizing the relevance of physics (Sections 1 to 3), I review some metaphysicians' replies to the argument, especially those by Callender, Lewis, Robinson and Sider (Section 4). Thereafter, I argue for three main conclusions. They all arise from the fact, emphasized in Section 2, that classical mechanics (non-relativistic as well as relativistic) is both more subtle, and more problematic, than philosophers generally realize. The first conclusion is that the RDA can be formulated more strongly than is usually recognized: it is not necessary to ``imagine away'' the dynamical effects of rotation (Section 5.5). The second is that in general relativity, the RDA fails because of frame-dragging (Section 5.6). The third is that even setting aside general relativity, the strong formulation of the RDA can after all be defeated (Section 6 onwards). Namely, by the perdurantist taking objects in classical mechanics (whether point-particles or continuous bodies) to have only temporally extended, i.e. non-instantaneous, temporal parts: which immediately blocks the RDA. Admittedly, this version of perdurantism defines persistence in a weaker sense of `definition' than pointilliste versions that aim to define persistence assuming only instantaneous temporal parts. But I argue that temporally extended temporal parts: (i) can do the jobs within the endurantism-perdurantism debate that the perdurantist wants temporal parts to do; and (ii) are supported by both classical and quantum mechanics.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Additional Information: | This version, of late July 2005, includes several corrections. | ||||||
Keywords: | persistence, endurance, perdurance, temporal parts, rotating discs, rotation, homogeneous matter, classical mechanics, decoherence | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics General Issues > Causation |
||||||
Depositing User: | Jeremy Butterfield | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 28 Jul 2005 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:13 | ||||||
Item ID: | 2381 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics General Issues > Causation |
||||||
Date: | May 2004 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2381 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
On the Persistence of Homogeneous Matter. (deposited 24 May 2004)
- On the Persistence of Homogeneous Matter. (deposited 28 Jul 2005) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |