Mikhalevich, Irina (2025) Intervention and Experiment. [Preprint]

Text Intervention and Experiment - Forthcoming in EJPS.pdf Download (586kB)

Abstract

The received view of scientific experimentation holds that science is characterized by experiment and experiment is characterized by active intervention on the system of interest. Although versions of this view are widely held, they have seldom been explicitly defended. The present essay reconstructs and defuses two arguments in defense of the received view: first, that intervention is necessary for uncovering causal structures, and second, that intervention conduces to better evidence. By examining a range of non-interventionist studies from across the sciences, I conclude that interventionist experiments are not, ceteris paribus, epistemically superior to non-interventionist studies and that the latter may thus be classified as experiment proper. My analysis explains why intervention remains valuable while at the same time elevating the status of some non-interventionist studies to that of experiment proper.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Mikhalevich, Irina igmikhal@ncsu.edu 0000-0001-8134-1533
Keywords:	experiment; intervention; observation; natural experiment; causation; evidence; control
Subjects:	General Issues > Evidence General Issues > Experimentation
Depositing User:	Dr. Irina Mikhalevich
Date Deposited:	27 Feb 2025 15:19
Last Modified:	27 Feb 2025 15:19
Item ID:	24840
Subjects:	General Issues > Evidence General Issues > Experimentation
Date:	24 February 2025
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/24840

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item