PhilSci Archive

Organizational accounts of malfunction. The dual-order approach and the normative field alternative

Barandiaran, Xabier (2025) Organizational accounts of malfunction. The dual-order approach and the normative field alternative. [Preprint]

[img] Text
Barandiaran_-_Organization_malfunction_-_BIOTHEORY-revised-FINAL-preprint-formatted.pdf

Download (506kB)

Abstract

The notion of malfunction is critical to biological explanation. It provides a test-bed for the normative character of functional attribution. Theories of biological functioning must permit traits to operate but, at the same time, be judged as malfunctioning (in some naturalized, non-arbitrary sense). Whereas malfunctioning has attracted most attention and discussion in evolutionary etiological approaches, systemic and organizational ones have been less discussed. The most influential of the organizational approaches (by Saborido, Moreno and Mossio) takes a dual-order approach to malfunctions, as a set of functions that fit first-order constitutive norms but fail to obey second-order regulatory ones. We argue that this conception is unnecessarily complicated (malfunctions do not need to arise as a result of two conflicting orders of norms) and too narrow (it excludes canonical cases of malfunctioning). We provide an alternative organizational account grounded on viability theory. The dynamics of the traits that constitute an organism define the normative field of its viability space: sugar must be replaced at certain rate, blood must be pumped at a certain pace, etc. A trait operates normatively when its effects on the viability space correlate positively with the normative field. Three senses of dysfunctionality might be distinguished: subfunctional operations are those that positively correlate with the normative field but quantitatively fail to match the required speed; malfunctional operations are those that do not positively correlate with the normative field; and, nonfunctional traits either don’t operate at all or operate with null effect on the normative field.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Barandiaran, Xabierxabier.barandiaran@ehu.eus0000-0002-4763-6845
Keywords: Normative function, natural norms, dysfunction, malfunction, normative field, autonomous organization.
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Function/Teleology
Depositing User: Dr. Xabier E. Barandiaran
Date Deposited: 31 Mar 2025 13:28
Last Modified: 31 Mar 2025 13:28
Item ID: 24977
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Function/Teleology
Date: 27 March 2025
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/24977

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item