PhilSci Archive

Sensorimotor teleology and goal-directedness. An organismic framework for normative behaviour

Barandiaran, Xabier and Rama, Tiago (2025) Sensorimotor teleology and goal-directedness. An organismic framework for normative behaviour. [Preprint]

[img] Text
CLEAN FINAL - Barandiaran and Rama - Sensorimotor teleology and goal-directedness.pdf

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Teleosemantics explains meaning by appealing to the biological norms that make error possible, but most work in the field still anchors those norms in evolutionary “selected‐effect” functions. We develop an organismic alternative grounded in the self-maintenance of autonomous systems. Building on sensorimotor theory and enactivism, we reconceptualise goals as second-order constraints—attractors in a dynamic sensorimotor field—and show how they are nested into a heterarchy of means–end relations connecting global self‑maintenance of the sensorimotor organization and identity of system with the most basic sensorimotor coordinations. Drawing on this framework, we identify the minimal necessary requirements for genuine teleological behaviour: 1. Initiation that individuates an action in relation to a goal, 2. Modulatory execution that adaptively compensates perturbations or deploys alternative strategies in relation to the goal, and 3. Meaningful termination through successful acknowledgment and transition, goal-sensitive persistence, or coherent abandonment. We locate normativity and error in the dynamic presuppositions among sensorimotor schemes and goals: failure manifests as incoordination within, or across, goal branches. We finally illustrate our account with a detailed analysis of the well known A-not-B error in psychology, showing how infants meet our teleological criteria while revealing incoordination as tension breakdowns inside a heterarchy of goals and sensorimotor schemes. Teleological behaviour, therefore, is the management of tensions and dynamic presuppositions within the goal heterarchy, not a chain of mechanical causes, thus delivering a naturalised notion of purposiveness that opens up an alternative route to teleosemantics beyond evolutionary selection.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Barandiaran, Xabierxabier.academic@barandiaran.net0000-0002-4763-6845
Rama, Tiagotrama.folco@gmail.com0000-0002-1531-7233
Keywords: Behavioural Norms; Teleology, Goal-directedness; Organizational Biology; Teleosemantics; A-not-B Error; Sensorimotor Normativity
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science > Action
Specific Sciences > Biology > Function/Teleology
General Issues > Causation
Specific Sciences > Complex Systems
General Issues > Explanation
Specific Sciences > Psychology
Depositing User: Dr. Xabier E. Barandiaran
Date Deposited: 28 May 2025 13:04
Last Modified: 28 May 2025 13:04
Item ID: 25369
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science > Action
Specific Sciences > Biology > Function/Teleology
General Issues > Causation
Specific Sciences > Complex Systems
General Issues > Explanation
Specific Sciences > Psychology
Date: 19 May 2025
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/25369

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item