PhilSci Archive

Coordinating dissent as an alternative to consensus classification: insights from systematics for bio‐ontologies

Sterner, Beckett and Witteveen, Joeri and Franz, Nico (2020) Coordinating dissent as an alternative to consensus classification: insights from systematics for bio‐ontologies. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. ISSN 0391-9714

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
Text
AlternativesToConsensusOntologies-March12-2019.pdf

Download (378kB) | Preview

Abstract

The collection and classification of data into meaningful categories is a key step in the process of knowledge making. In the life sciences, the design of data discovery and integration tools has relied on the premise that a formal classifica- tory system for expressing a body of data should be grounded in consensus defi- nitions for classifications. On this approach, exemplified by the realist program of the Open Biomedical Ontologies Foundry, progress is maximized by grounding the representation and aggregation of data on settled knowledge. We argue that histori- cal practices in systematic biology provide an important and overlooked alternative approach to classifying and disseminating data, based on a principle of coordinative rather than definitional consensus. Systematists have developed a robust system for referring to taxonomic entities that can deliver high quality data discovery and inte- gration without invoking consensus about reality or “settled” science.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Sterner, Beckettbsterne1@asu.edu0000-0001-5219-7616
Witteveen, Joerij.wit@me.com0000-0003-1291-9156
Franz, Niconmfranz@asu.edu0000-0001-7089-7018
Keywords: Bio-ontologies, Big data, Data-centrism, Consensus principle, Coordination, Ontology alignment, Biodiversity informatics
Subjects: General Issues > Data
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Systematics
Specific Sciences > Computer Science
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
General Issues > Theory Change
Depositing User: Dr. Beckett Sterner
Date Deposited: 03 Jun 2025 13:12
Last Modified: 03 Jun 2025 13:12
Item ID: 25542
Journal or Publication Title: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Publisher: Springer
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-0300-z
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1007/s40656-020-0300-z
Subjects: General Issues > Data
Specific Sciences > Biology
Specific Sciences > Biology > Systematics
Specific Sciences > Computer Science
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
General Issues > Theory Change
Date: 2020
ISSN: 0391-9714
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/25542

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item