PhilSci Archive

Misplaced Trust in Expertise: Pseudo-Experts and Unreliable Experts

Croce, Michel and Marsili, Neri (2025) Misplaced Trust in Expertise: Pseudo-Experts and Unreliable Experts. Social Epistemology. ISSN 0269-1728

[img] Text
Misplaced trust in expertise final_2403.pdf

Download (372kB)

Abstract

The persistence of scientific misconceptions is often attributed to a decline in trust in experts. Against this simplistic picture, we emphasize that misplaced trust in expertise plays a crucial role in sustaining such misconceptions: even laypeople actively seeking expert guidance may nonetheless place their trust in unreliable sources. The paper identifies two main kinds of ’epistemic traps’ that are relevant to this phenomenon. In addition to fake experts who flaunt competence they lack (like pseudoexperts and pseudo-scientists), we emphasise the importance of unreliable experts, who possess relevant credentials but systematically offer unreliable testimony. The resulting picture clashes with the commonplace idea that laypeople bear significant epistemic blame for endorsing misconceptions. Even responsible agents can be misled by unreliable experts who display legitimate credentials: the less evident the source’s unreliability, the less responsible is the agent for being misled.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Croce, Michel
Marsili, Neri0000-0001-7853-7359
Keywords: Experts Deference Markers of expertise Pseudo-experts Pseudo-science Trust Scientific misconceptions Credentials Rogue experts
Subjects: General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
Depositing User: Dr Neri Marsili
Date Deposited: 09 Jun 2025 13:27
Last Modified: 09 Jun 2025 13:27
Item ID: 25632
Journal or Publication Title: Social Epistemology
Official URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02691...
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1080/02691728.2025.2491104
Subjects: General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science
Date: June 2025
ISSN: 0269-1728
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/25632

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item