PhilSci Archive

Pain Asymbolia Is Probably Still Pain

Duval, Alexandre and Klein, Colin (2025) Pain Asymbolia Is Probably Still Pain. [Preprint]

[img] Text
Duval&Klein_2025_Asymbolia_still_pain.pdf

Download (285kB)

Abstract

Trevor Griffith and Adrian Kind argue that we should reject a standard interpretation of pain asymbolia, according to which asymbolics experience pain even though their pain lacks the affective-motivational element that typical pains possess. We make the case that Griffith and Kind’s reasons for rejecting the standard interpretation are relatively weak. We end by arguing that debates between the standard interpretation and alternative interpretations cannot be resolved without addressing the issue of how we should taxonomize pain asymbolia as a neurological condition.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Duval, Alexandreaduval@proton.me0000-0002-9804-7039
Klein, ColinColin.Klein@anu.edu.au0000-0002-7406-4010
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Psychology
Depositing User: Dr Alexandre Duval
Date Deposited: 09 Jun 2025 13:36
Last Modified: 09 Jun 2025 13:36
Item ID: 25640
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Psychology
Date: 2025
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/25640

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item