Spiegel, Irina (2025) The Possibility of a General Theory of Normativity in Light of the Number-Counts-Debate. [Preprint]

Text general-normativity-number-counts-debate-spiegel.pdf Download (222kB)

Abstract

This article revisits Taurek’s famous question: Should the greater number be saved in situations of resource scarcity? At the heart of this debate lies a central issue in normative ethics—whether numerical superiority can constitute a moral pro tanto reason. Engaging with this question helps to illuminate core principles of normative theory. Welfarism$^{min}$ presents a pro-number position. The article first outlines Taurek’s original argument. It then examines non-welfarist responses and explains why they remain unsatisfactory. Finally, it identifies the main shortcomings of the hybrid welfarism$^{min}$ approach and suggests a possible alternative for more adequately addressing the Taurek problem.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Spiegel, Irina irina.spiegel@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Keywords:	Number-counts-debate, aggregation, welfarism, neo-contractualism, Taurek problem.
Subjects:	General Issues > Decision Theory Specific Sciences > Psychology > Social Psychology General Issues > Thought Experiments
Depositing User:	Dr. Irina Spiegel
Date Deposited:	28 Jun 2025 15:20
Last Modified:	28 Jun 2025 15:20
Item ID:	25842
Subjects:	General Issues > Decision Theory Specific Sciences > Psychology > Social Psychology General Issues > Thought Experiments
Date:	31 June 2025
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/25842

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item