PhilSci Archive

Post-Growth and the Lack of Diversity in the Scenario Framework

rawad, el skaf (2025) Post-Growth and the Lack of Diversity in the Scenario Framework. [Preprint]

[img] Text
PEN-WP_2025-3.pdf

Download (647kB)

Abstract

Scenarios and pathways, as defined and used in the “SSP-RCP scenario framework”, are key in last decade’s climate change research and in the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In this framework, Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) consist of a limited set of alternative socioeconomic futures, that are both represented in short qualitative narratives and with quantitative projections of key drivers. One important use of the computationally derived SSP-scenarios is to do mitigation analysis and present a “manageable” set of options to decision-makers. However, all SSPs and derivatively SSP-scenarios in this framework assume a globally growing economy into 2100. This, in practice, amounts to a value-laden restriction of the space of solutions to be presented to decision-makers, falling short of IPCC’s general mandate of being “policy-relevant and yet policy-neutral, never policy-prescriptive”. Yet, the Global Economic Growth Assumption (GEGA) could be challenged and in practice is challenged by post-growth scholars. However, for post-growth mitigation scenarios to be constructed, explored, and assessed more systematically, they need to be fully integrated into the scenario framework. This is not done yet. I argue, from a philosophy of value-laden science perspective, that this should be done and propose two ways. This integration follows from and satisfies a diversity criterion, which derivatively enhances the framework’s “objectivity” and the IPCC’s policy-neutrality.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
rawad, el skafrawadskaff@gmail.com
Keywords: Post-growth; SSP-RCP scenario framework; mitigation scenarios; nonepistemic values; diversity; objectivity
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Economics
Specific Sciences > Engineering
Specific Sciences > Environmental Science
General Issues > Ethical Issues
General Issues > Experimentation
General Issues > Feminist Approaches
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > Models and Idealization
General Issues > Science and Society
General Issues > Science and Policy
General Issues > Values In Science
Depositing User: Dr. Rawad El Skaf
Date Deposited: 04 Jul 2025 12:44
Last Modified: 04 Jul 2025 12:44
Item ID: 25879
Official URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13501...
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1080/1350178X.2025.2480069
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Economics
Specific Sciences > Engineering
Specific Sciences > Environmental Science
General Issues > Ethical Issues
General Issues > Experimentation
General Issues > Feminist Approaches
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > Models and Idealization
General Issues > Science and Society
General Issues > Science and Policy
General Issues > Values In Science
Date: 2025
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/25879

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item